Why Dealers Are Not Your Distribution Channel — They’re Your Risk Filter
- Chiao Kai Chang
- 21 hours ago
- 4 min read
A Ground-Level View from Southeast Asia’s EV Motorcycle Market
When electric motorcycle sales stall in Southeast Asia, I often hear the same explanation:
“Dealers are not pushing hard enough.”
It’s an easy conclusion to reach. It’s also one of the most misleading.
From what I’ve seen across Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand, dealers are rarely the bottleneck because they lack motivation or understanding.They are cautious for a much simpler reason:
they are filtering risk.

Dealers don’t ask “Can I sell this?”
They ask “What problems will this bring back to my shop?”
Most motorcycle dealers in Southeast Asia are not large retail chains.They are small, family-run businesses operating on thin margins and tight cash flow.
When a new electric motorcycle brand approaches them, their internal checklist looks very different from what most brands expect.
They are not thinking about:
brand vision
long-term electrification trends
technology leadership
They are thinking about:
who handles the first angry customer
how long repairs will take
whether spare parts arrive in days or weeks
what happens if the brand stops responding
From their point of view, selling a motorcycle is not a transaction — it’s a long-term responsibility.
Why high margins don’t compensate for high uncertainty
One of the most common misconceptions I hear is:
“If margins are attractive enough, dealers will push the product.”
That logic rarely holds in practice.
Margins represent upside. Uncertainty represents downside.
In Southeast Asia, dealers consistently choose:
predictable, lower-margin productsover
higher-margin products that introduce new risks
A familiar ICE motorcycle with modest margins but known failure modes is often far more attractive than an EV with unclear service pathways.
Dealers don’t optimize for profit per unit.They optimize for problem minimization.
The silent rejection pattern: “listed but not pushed”
There is a pattern I see repeatedly, especially with new EV brands:
the motorcycle is displayed in-store
brochures are available
sales staff know the specifications
But when a customer asks for a recommendation, the EV is rarely suggested.
From headquarters, this looks like poor execution. From the dealer’s side, it is deliberate risk control.
By listing but not pushing, dealers:
avoid confrontation
avoid inventory exposure
avoid being the first point of blame
Demand is allowed to pull — if it exists.And if it doesn’t, the dealer remains protected.
Why training and marketing rarely change this behavior
When sales underperform, brands often respond with:
more product training
additional incentives
stronger marketing materials
These efforts usually fail to move the needle.
Not because dealers don’t understand the product —but because knowledge does not reduce risk.
No amount of training convinces a dealer to push a motorcycle if:
battery responsibility is unclear
software behavior feels unpredictable
spare parts logistics are fragile
escalation paths are slow or invisible
Until these concerns are structurally addressed, behavior won’t change.
Dealers absorb risk long before brands feel it
Here’s a reality that’s often underestimated:
When something goes wrong with a motorcycle, the customer does not call headquarters.They go back to the dealer.
Even if the issue originates from:
battery degradation
controller failure
software behavior
The dealer becomes the face of the problem.
Unless the brand has clearly absorbed that risk — through fast response, parts availability, and visible support — dealers will instinctively limit exposure.
This is not resistance. It’s self-preservation.
Why dealer conservatism keeps the system stable
It’s tempting to frame dealer caution as backward or risk-averse.
That misses the point.
Dealers sit at the intersection of:
consumers
financing partners
service realities
They see patterns early.They see which brands disappear quietly.They see how fast reputations travel in local networks.
In Southeast Asia, this conservatism is not a flaw. It is what prevents the system from collapsing under constant experimentation.
What EV brands that gain dealer traction do differently
The brands that eventually earn dealer trust tend to do a few unglamorous things exceptionally well:
they make battery liability explicit
they guarantee spare parts availability
they respond quickly and visibly to early failures
they over-communicate service responsibility
In short, they prove that risk does not stop at the dealer’s door.
Once that confidence exists, selling becomes far easier — without additional incentives.
Reframing the question founders should ask
Instead of asking:“Why aren’t dealers selling our bikes harder?”
A more useful question is:“What risk are we still asking dealers to carry for us?”
If the answer isn’t clear, the dealer has already decided.
Closing reflection
In Southeast Asia, dealers are not distribution channels waiting to be activated.
They are filters — quietly deciding which products the system is ready to absorb.
If a motorcycle passes that filter, scale becomes possible.If it doesn’t, no amount of marketing will force it through.
What comes next
If dealers are filtering risk, one final gatekeeper remains:
financing.
In the next piece, I’ll look at why many electric motorcycles never fail publicly —they simply never get financed at scale.
Want to continue the conversation?
If you’re building or advising an electric motorcycle business in Southeast Asia — and want a grounded discussion about dealers, risk ownership, and realistic go-to-market paths — you can explore more of my work here: https://www.thekaiassociates.com
Or reach out directly.I’m always more interested in discussing what actually slows scale than repeating optimistic narratives.




Comments